Operational Qualification (OQ) Protocol and Report Format
Contents
- What is operational qualification?
- Documentation expectations
- Example OQ protocol format
- Header and approval
- 1. Objective
- 2. Scope
- 3. Responsibilities
- 4. Materials, equipment and documents
- 5. Procedure
- Chart 1: calibration of test apparatus and instruments
- Chart 2: document, training and manual check
- Chart 3: control points and alarms
- Chart 4: outputs
- Chart 5: calibration of the equipment or system
- Chart 6: specific challenge tests
- Deviation report
- Example OQ report content
- Release for use
- Record retention
- Frequently asked questions
- Is OQ always separate from IQ?
- Why test at upper and lower limits?
- Can OQ be done with product?
- What happens if a test fails?
- References
In short: Operational qualification (OQ) is the documented check that installed equipment or a system works as designed across its anticipated operating ranges. This page explains what EU GMP Annex 15 expects from OQ and gives an example protocol and report format that you must adapt to your own quality system.
What is operational qualification?
EU GMP Annex 15 (Qualification and Validation, 2015) defines OQ as the documented verification that facilities, systems and equipment, as installed or modified, perform as intended throughout the anticipated operating ranges.
Key points from Annex 15, section 3:
- OQ normally follows installation qualification (IQ). For simple equipment the two may be combined as an installation/operation qualification, IOQ (3.10).
- OQ should include, but is not limited to, tests developed from knowledge of the process, system and equipment to show it operates as designed, and tests of the upper and lower operating limits and/or worst-case conditions (3.11).
- A successful OQ should allow the operating and cleaning procedures, operator training and preventive maintenance requirements to be finalised (3.12).
In practice this means: identify the critical operating parameters, challenge them at the limits, verify controls, alarms, interlocks, outputs and instrument calibration, and only then release the item for performance qualification (PQ).
See also: Installation qualification (IQ) protocol and report, Performance qualification (PQ) protocol and report format and Qualification stages for equipment, facilities, utilities and systems.
Documentation expectations
Annex 15, section 2, applies to OQ as to every qualification document:
- The protocol defines the critical systems, attributes and parameters and the associated acceptance criteria (2.4).
- Qualification documents are approved by the personnel defined in the pharmaceutical quality system (2.2).
- A significant change to the approved protocol during execution is a deviation and must be scientifically justified (2.7).
- A result that fails a predefined acceptance criterion is recorded as a deviation and investigated; its implications are discussed in the report (2.8).
- The report summarises results against the acceptance criteria and ends with a recommendation on the outcome (2.9).
- Release to the next stage (PQ) is formally authorised (2.10).
Example OQ protocol format
This is an illustrative template. Replace the bracketed items with details from your own approved validation master plan, user requirements and risk assessment. See also Validation Master Plan.
Header and approval
| Field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Protocol number | |
| Title | Operational Qualification of [equipment or system] |
| Site name and address | |
| Related validation protocol / IQ reference | |
| Page | ___ of ___ |
| Written by / date | |
| Approved by / date | |
| QA approval / date |
1. Objective
To confirm that the [equipment or system] operates according to its specifications, and to record the information and data that demonstrate it functions as intended across its operating ranges.
2. Scope
OQ is carried out after IQ is complete and approved, and again (fully or partly, as decided through change control) after a modification or relocation that may affect operation.
3. Responsibilities
| Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Operator or user department | Performs the tests and records the data |
| Supervisor | Supervises the work, checks records are complete, writes the deviation report and the OQ report |
| Quality Assurance | Reviews and approves the protocol, deviations and report |
4. Materials, equipment and documents
- List of calibrated test instruments and apparatus, with ID and calibration due date (Chart 1).
- Draft or approved operating SOPs and data sheets for normal operation (Chart 2).
- Training records showing operators are trained (Chart 2).
- Manufacturer’s manuals (Chart 2).
5. Procedure
- Record the calibration status of the test apparatus and instruments (Chart 1).
- Check documents, training and manuals (Chart 2).
- Test and record the operation of control points, interlocks and alarms (Chart 3).
- Test and record outputs (Chart 4).
- List the calibration requirements of the system and record the calibration status (Chart 5).
- Challenge the system at normal and, where appropriate, worst-case or upper and lower operating limits (Chart 6).
- Record every deviation, then write a deviation report with justification and impact.
- Write the OQ report and send the package to QA for review and approval.
Chart 1: calibration of test apparatus and instruments
| Apparatus / instrument | Calibration method | Calibration date | Due date |
|---|---|---|---|
Performed by / date: ______ Verified by / date: ______
Chart 2: document, training and manual check
| SOP title and number | File location | QA approval date |
|---|---|---|
| Course / SOP number | Staff name | Training date |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment make and model | Manual available |
|---|---|
| Yes / No |
Performed by / date: ______ Verified by / date: ______
Chart 3: control points and alarms
| Control point / alarm | Test method | Acceptance criterion | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chart 4: outputs
| Output | Acceptance criterion | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Chart 5: calibration of the equipment or system
| Calibration SOP (short title and number) | Result | Date |
|---|---|---|
Chart 6: specific challenge tests
Record each test under normal conditions and under worst-case conditions or at the upper and lower operating limits, with the set point, the observed result and the acceptance criterion.
| Test | Condition (normal / low limit / high limit) | Acceptance criterion | Result | Pass / Fail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Each chart ends with lines for performed by / date, deviations noted, and verified by / date.
Deviation report
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Deviation(s) | Describe each, with its reference number |
| Justification for acceptance | Scientific reason the result can be accepted, or the corrective action |
| Impact on operation | Effect on product quality, the validated state and later qualification stages |
| Written by / date |
Example OQ report content
The OQ report should include:
- date the study started and date it finished;
- observations made and problems encountered;
- completeness of the information collected;
- a summary of the deviation report;
- results of the control and alarm tests, with sample data where appropriate;
- location of the original data;
- any other relevant information; and
- a conclusion on whether the equipment or system operates as intended, with a recommendation on release to PQ.
The report is written by a named person, dated, and approved by Quality Assurance.
Release for use
Do not release equipment for routine use until the qualification stages required by your protocol are complete and calibration, cleaning, maintenance, training and related tests are acceptable. For many items the next step is PQ (PQ protocol and report format).
Record retention
Keep the signed protocol, raw data and report under your document control system. Where qualification data support the release of batches, retain them for at least 1 year after the expiry date of the respective product batch (EU GMP Part I Chapter 4 section 4.11, or 5 years after QP certification if longer; also 21 CFR 211.180(a)), and longer if local law or the marketing authorisation requires.
Frequently asked questions
Is OQ always separate from IQ?
No. Annex 15 allows a combined IQ/OQ (IOQ) depending on the complexity of the equipment, if the protocol justifies it.
Why test at upper and lower limits?
Because OQ must show the equipment performs throughout its anticipated operating range, not only at the set point. Annex 15 asks for tests of upper and lower operating limits and/or worst-case conditions.
Can OQ be done with product?
Annex 15 places tests using production materials, qualified substitutes or simulated product at worst-case batch sizes in PQ (3.14). OQ tests focus on whether the equipment operates as designed, so many are run without product.
What happens if a test fails?
Record it as a deviation, investigate under your procedures, justify any acceptance or repeat, and discuss the implications in the report (Annex 15, 2.8).
References
- European Commission, EudraLex Volume 4, EU GMP Guidelines, Annex 15: Qualification and Validation (2015), sections 2.2, 2.4, 2.7 to 2.10 and 3.10 to 3.14, and the glossary definition of OQ.
- European Commission, EudraLex Volume 4, Part I, Chapter 4: Documentation (revision effective 30 June 2011), section 4.11.
- US FDA, 21 CFR 211.180(a), General requirements (records retention).
Related articles
Biological Indicators for Heat and Gas Sterilisation Validation
Biological indicators explained: D-value, z-value, test organisms for steam, dry heat and ethylene oxide, how to place them, and what GMP expects in validation.
Calibration and Qualification of QC Laboratory Equipment
How a QC laboratory keeps instruments fit for use: equipment qualification (DQ, IQ, OQ, PQ), calibration, performance checks, status labels, records and traceability.
Dirty Equipment Hold Time Study Report: Injection Ampoule Section
Learn how to plan and report a dirty equipment hold time study for an injection ampoule section: protocol, sampling, acceptance criteria and an example report.
EU GMP Annex 11 Computerised Systems: Requirements Explained
Plain-language guide to EU GMP Annex 11 on computerised systems: risk management, personnel, suppliers and the validation requirements, with revision status.